Case for MacKenzie
For: Fastest large-scale wealth redistribution in history; gives with minimal overhead.
What voters may question: For: Created thousands of media jobs; supported some journalism institutions.
← Rankings
MacKenzie Scottvs
Rupert Murdoch
MacKenzie Scott vs Rupert Murdoch: Who did more good?
MacKenzie Scott vs Rupert Murdoch: Who did more good?
This matchup is based on public perception from anonymous votes. Pick the person you think had the better impact.
Crowd verdict
Building data — needs 5+ votes for a full verdict.
Vote this matchup →The short case
Case for Rupert
For: Created thousands of media jobs; supported some journalism institutions.
What voters may question: For: Fastest large-scale wealth redistribution in history; gives with minimal overhead.
MacKenzie Scott
Rupert Murdoch
1,479
ELO
1,343
50%
Win rate
21%
—
7d trend
—
40%
Divisive ↓
0%